2008-03-13 // 11:49:37
inkaust
yes, the typo again, you're right. i guess, you wouldn't listen...
but are you saying you +would+ listen?

^ sure. I even would ask you before, if just a little bit unsure. (but didn't we speak about this even more general -or specific- just recently?) (and btw, at this one - you already had agreed :)

2008-03-13 // 10:59:57
inkaust
ok, ok. if i hated it i would insist on removing it from here (even though you probably would listen).

and you kno what, it also makes me smile. because i made the same face expression as i did as a small girl (which i don't remember but can see at old pictures).

i like to think i'll always be a child.

so i guess, i like this picture after all :o)

^ :o)) see?! (one of your interesting typos again btw - sure you did want to write wouldn't listen. and sure I would)

2008-03-12 // 12:10:11
inkaust
g. ............. i'm not sure if i like it. look like a drunk child in a fog..
maybe it's worth mentioning that the other side is here: »link

hmm

^ ... i just realize I didn't wrote something here, but (most probably) in a mail to stefans, or you, or somewhere in an other commentbox. so, will leave it here now, in the commentbox - POLA SOUL is right enough - : it wasn't and isn't about if you like it. it was that you said 'that's not me', but insisted later to not have said 'I don't like it' neither (which I got first) - plus, we (other) agreed it is you. not drunk child in a fog at all in sense of party pic. drunk maybe. child as well in sense of loving the world and open eyes. or, as stefan wrote me: " (...) sooo wonderful, just made me smile and smile & smile." (and btw, I already linked to the other side by carefully adding the tag 'standing on a table' exatly ;-)